Defend your cyber budget in euros
Your board does not read technical scores. It decides in euros.
We turn what is exploitable in your systems into a clear figure: what an incident could cost you, across which areas, and what each euro of remediation brings down. You walk into the room with a costed decision, not a list of flaws.
Each decision is defensible. The full picture is not.
Every week you decide on judgment: what to fix, what to fund, what to leave. Taken one at a time, each call defends itself. Put end to end, they form no overall picture your leadership can stand behind when an incident hits. You need a shared language with the board, and that language is the euro.
What you put on the table
Risk in figures
We quantify what an incident could cost, area by area, instead of a technical score the board cannot read.
A language the board understands
The attack path and the flaw behind it become one plain sentence: what inaction costs, what the fix avoids.
A record for the audit committee
Every decision stays timestamped and justified, ready to present as is to your audit committee.
Always current
The picture updates with every new measurement. You present the real situation, not a snapshot from an audit a year ago.
A list of flaws becomes a decision
Instead of a list of flaws, you put forward one sentence the board can act on: this fix avoids this much risk, for this cost. The conversation is about an amount, not about technical vocabulary.
Risk in euros, for the board
Security presents the risk in euros, leadership decides.
"For the first time, I can verify our provider's work and present our priorities to the board without translating. Leadership understands where the budget goes, and why."
Patrick Da FonsecaInfrastructure and Security Director, GaranceFrequently asked questions
How do you present cyber risk in euros to the board?
By starting from what is genuinely exploitable in your systems, not from a sector average. We quantify what an incident would cost, area by area, and the board decides on an amount.
Do NIS2 or DORA require quantifying risk in euros?
NIS2, the European network and information security regulation, calls for measures proportionate to risk, with no euro figure. DORA, which targets the financial sector, requires an estimate of aggregated annual losses. In both cases your leadership must answer for the risk, and a figure makes that accountable.
How is this different from a cyber risk management tool?
Broad risk management designs annual budget envelopes. We help you defend how that budget is used, decision by decision, on what is genuinely exploitable in your systems.
Do you need an annual workshop to produce this reporting?
No. The reporting updates with every new measurement. You bring the board a current picture without starting from a workshop each time.
Who is responsible for cyber risk?
Since NIS2 and DORA, it is the management body. The security lead carries the pressure without carrying the legal responsibility. Our role is to give them what they need to equip their leadership.
Quantify your risk
Let's talk about what an incident could cost you, and how to present it to your board.